Exposing problems : basic problem areas: Q C D S M
- Quality
- Cost
- Delivery
- Safety
- Morale
Wrong Mindset for Problem Solving : Mental Attitudes that block Improvement
Midset Issue
- "I Know everything is moving fine. There is no problem"
- "We have tried everything. I have all the reasons why things will not work"
- "This is how we have done it for many years. This is the best method for us"
- "It's not my responsibility to make improvements"
- "Improvement costs money. Give me then thousand dollars, then I can fix it"
- "I'm too busy to do anything"
Attitudinal Issues
- Not studying in spite of a lack of knowledge
- Not trying. Easily giving up. Not experimenting
- complaining to managers, staff people, otheres
- Not asking for comments or suggestions from others
- Taking a "what's in it for me?" attitude
- Assuming that making improvement is not fun
Right mindset for Problem Solving : mental Attitudes that promote Improvement
Mindset issues
- "There is no end for improvement"
- "Don't think of excuses for why it will not work. Think positively"
- "Always consider the current situation as imperfect"
- "Do away with a fixed mindset"
- "lets think from a broader perspective"
- "keep working on improvement so that fire-fighting will eventually go away"
Attitudinal Issues
- Unless we force ourselves to the corner, no ideas will be generated.
- Ask "why" repeatedly to get to the root cause and fix it, permanently
- Collect people's wisdom, as opposed to depending on one's own wisdom
- Implement good ideas immediately; stop bad habits immediately
- Even if it isn't perfect, let us to ahead one step at a time
- Work can be fun. Coming up with ideas and implementing them is a satisfying experience
Tools for Problem Solving
- Cause and effect diagram
- Histogram
- Stratification and is/is not analyses
- Checksheets
- Flow chart
- Pareto chart
- Control chart
- Scatter diagram
- Run chart
basic Concept and Techniques
- Using common sense, creativity, intuition
- Simplify, combine, and eliminate
- Elimination of seven wastes (from overproduction, waiting time, transportation, processing, inventory, motion, and product defects)
- Elimination of the eighth waste (not utilizing people's talent)
- Elimination of the ninth waste (waste of imformation)
- Asking "why" five times
- 4-M checklist (man, machine, method, and material>
- 5MIE checklist (4-M plus measurement and environment)
- 6MIE checklist (5MIE plus management information)
- Practicing the "three reals," i.e., real scene (fenba), real thing (genbutsu), and real fact (genjitsu)
- Attacking the key area first (i.e., use pareto principle)
- Controlling the scatter / uncertainly
- Practicing glass wass management
- PDCA (plan-do-check=act) cycle
- Looking at the picture from shop floor point of view
- Using QC story, or other organized problem-solving steps
- Brainstorming / group meeting
- Momos to record new thoughts or problems identified during work
Waste Reduction Techniques
- Quick response (JIT)
- Kanban
- TOC (Theory of Constraints)
- SMED (Rapid Change-overs)
- SPC (Statistical Process Control)
- TPM (Total Preventive Maintenance) & Good Housekeeping
- Poka Yoke, Jidoka and Andon
How to use the techniques?
An approach : Start with Quick Response (JIT)
- Reduce the time between operations by:
- reducing the Work-in-Progress
- reducing the batchsize
- Trackling the problems at the source
Quick Response Approach
- Reduce queues between operations
- Reduce batch sizes
- Monitor problems
- Tackle problems at source
- Further reduce queues
- Further reduce batch sizes
- Applicable everywhere
- Scope depends upon business
- Speed of implementation depends upon organization
Where to apply Quick Response
- Focus on high volume products
- Focus on bottleneck resources
- Spread to whole of business
Quick Response Advantages
- Short lead time
- Reduced inventory
- Reduced obsolescence
- Quick response of problems, while "trail is fresh", this results in a higher yield and quality
- faster on learning curve
- Less NVAA (handling - paperwork - counting inventory)
- Lower costs
- Customer satisfaction
- Better morale of personnel (join the winning team) (team building)
- Increased flexibility on customer demands
Barriers to Waste Elimination : We have our efficiency targets, but:
- Who is setting the efficiency targets?
- Who is producing the improvement plans?
- Does the shop floor own the targets and the plans?
Specific Tools for Problem solving
1. Industrial engineering (IE)
- Man-machine chart
- Work combination chart
- Process analysis
- material flow analysis
- Business Process mapping
- Setup time reduction
- Product-oriented layout
- One-piece flow production
- Cross-training and multi-process handling
- Cycle time analysis
- Seven tools of QC - histogram, cause-and-effect diagram, check sheet, pareto diagram, graph, contral chart, and scatter diagram
- Seven new tools - relations diagram, affinity diagram, tree diagram, matrix, matrix data-analysis diagram, PDPC (Process decision progrchart), arrow diagram
- Others - fail-safe mechanisms (poka-yoke), flow chart, run chart, Taguchi method
- Value = Function/ Cost
- Parts commonality, variety reduction
- Fault tree analysis (FTA)
- Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA)
- Workplace organization
- Lot size reduction
- Leveled production
- Pull vs. push system (kanban vs MRP)
- Inventory list of technology
- Quality function deployment (QFD)
- Design for manufacturability
- Organization - leadership, communication, teamwork, motivation
- Marketing - market segmentation, attribute analysis, sampling
- Economics - pricing, supply and demand, net present value
- Finance / accounting - financial analysis, cash flow analysis
- Time management
- Project management - Pert chart, Gantt chart, flow chart
- Competitive strategy - benchmarks, etc.
Checklist to Review the Process of Problem Solving (QC Story)
1. Selection of Theme
- Was the theme discussed thoroughly by all team members?
- Was the theme selected voluntarily?
- Are the skills of team members adequate for accomplishing the objective?
- Does it reflect the needs of the workplace, mission, and objectives of the company?
- Was there evaluation of the actual situation vs. the plan, or level of customer satisfaction?
- Were the Three Reals addressed appropriately?
- Are problems studied from differt view points?
- Are problem area narrowed down?
- Is the process of setting goals appropriate?
- Is the objective of improvment clearly defined?
- Are reasons for goals convincing?
- Are there clear goals of what to do by when and how much?
- Is there clear plan of action using the 5W2H principle (who is to do what, when, where, why, how, and how much)?
- Ae there sufficient opportunities so that everybody can contribute?
- Is it evident that the them asked why many times?
- Is a cause-and-effect relationship clear?
- is the use of data / information appropriate?
- Is there good use of proprietary technology and problem solving techniques?
- Does everybody help by contributing their ideas?
- Are there strong relationships between causes and countermeasures?
- Do countermeasures reflect everyone's creativity, including the opinions of managers, staff, customers, and suppliers?
- Is the solution unique or original?
- Are there evaluations of effectiveness, expected bebefit, and implementation of countermeasures?
- Is the plan to implement countermeasures executable?
- Are countermeasures implemented using people's ingenuity?
- is there evidence of people making extra effort?
- Does everybody help in executing the plans?
- Are there considerations on stadardization in the future?
- Are results, both tangible and intangible, monitored appropriately?
- Are there clear relationships between countermeasures and accomplishments?
- does the project move forward as planned?
- Do other parties buy into the improvement plan as well as the solution?
- Have the expected results been accomplished?
- What are the reasons for any difference between planned and actual results?
- Does the team establish standards after resolution of the problem?
- Is there standardization to prevent the same problems form recurring?
- Is there creative thought in practicing standardization?
- Do theam members develop confidence and self-esteem as part of process?
- is there adequate education and training for everybody?
- is there improvement from how the previous project went?
- Have many additional suggestions been generated in the process?
- Was the PDCA cycle practiced during the whole improvement activity?
- Following the lessons learned, is there clear direction for the future?
1 comments:
good to know the topics but it will be best if it has been explained
Post a Comment